This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources.
Do not instantly seize upon a title that sounds appealing and plunge into it headlong.
Instead, read carefully all titles that is, all topics or questions on the list. Remember that you may not change the title to something else that you wish you had been asked, but must respond to what the IB has given. What are the key words or concepts?
Are there key words of the Theory of Knowledge course in the title -- words such as "belief", "justification", or "truth"?
Are you clear about what they mean? Are you aware of ambiguities, or of possible alternative meanings? Think back on class discussions and check class notes. How are the key concepts related to each other?
Put the title into your own words to make sure you understand what is being asked. Do not even consider skipping this step. What exactly are you being told to do? What are the key words of instruction?
If you are told to "analyse" or "evaluate" a claim, then you are supposed to consider the arguments both for and against it, taking into account any ambiguities interpreting it. Possible responses, for example: If you are asked "to what extent" or "in what way" the statement is justified, then you are being asked the same thing, but in different words.
If you are being asked a question directly "Is x true? If you are asked to "compare" areas of knowledge or ways of knowing, justifications, methodologies, or the like, you are being asked to examine both similarities and differences in response to the title.
In some cases, the "how" question is simply a variation of "in what way? Ultimately, all titles in Theory of Knowledge, no matter how they are phrased, ask you to do the same thing. You are being asked to think critically about major issues of knowledge.
These instructions tell you exactly what you are expected to do in your essay: Always justify your statements and provide relevant examples to illustrate your arguments, and remember to consider what can be said against them. If you use external sources, cite them according to a recognized convention.
Examiners mark essays against the title as set. Respond to the title as given; do not alter it in any way. Your essay must be between and words in length. Pay attention to the description of the top mark in each of the six criteria in order to set your goals for an appropriate essay.Meaning and the Problem of Universals, A Kant-Friesian Approach.
One of the most durable and intractable issues in the history of philosophy has been the problem of alphabetnyc.comy related to this, and a major subject of debate in 20th century philosophy, has been the problem of the nature of the meaning..
The problem of universals goes back to Plato and Aristotle. Sociological theory vs. social theory. Kenneth Allan proposed the distinction between sociological theory and social alphabetnyc.com Allan's usage, sociological theory consists of abstract and testable propositions about society.
It often heavily relies on the scientific method, which aims for objectivity, and attempts to avoid passing value alphabetnyc.com contrast, social theory, according to Allan. Albrecht Dürer: The Genius with a Great Soul. Albrecht Dürer was not only the greatest artist of the Northern Renaissance, but also a unique personality, his genius coexisting with a pure, noble character.
Situating Constructionism. By Seymour Papert and Idit Harel.
The following essay is the first chapter in Seymour Papert and Idit Harel's book Constructionism (Ablex Publishing Corporation, ). Six steps to writing a good TOK essay: A student guide. 1. SELECT A TITLE FROM THE LIST PROVIDED BY THE IB. Do not instantly seize upon a title that .
I originally introduced the term “orthorexia” in the article below, published in the October issue of Yoga Journal. Some of the things I said in the article are no longer true of .